Splicetoday

Pop Culture
Nov 28, 2024, 06:28AM

It Wasn’t a Balm for My Wounds

A 2014 The New Yorker interview with novelist Chang-rae Lee vs. a 2019 BmoreArt interview with artist Ruth Pettus.

Images.jpeg?ixlib=rails 2.1

Chang-rae Lee: The thing about the plural voice is that, once instituted, you realize there are really no rules about what might limit its point of view.

Ruth Pettus: We went to Paris first. We went to London.

Lee: You’re charting as you go.

Pettus: Not entirely. I had been to her gallery before.

Lee: Narrative doesn’t quite work that way.

•••

Pettus: There was one, the one of Peter receiving the key from Jesus, and behind them there is a group of men in togas in a line.

Lee: And I get this sensation of movement, physical movement, while sitting there in front of my computer.

Pettus: Pouring, brushing and rolling it on. I do get very fatigued.

Lee: There’s uncontaminated food and total security and the means to do whatever one might desire.

Pettus: Yes! As younger girls, we were all about horses and we were able to have our own horses in Australia, but it wasn’t a balm for my wounds.

•••

Lee: It was a fascinating place, certainly not awful, sort of like a prep-school campus that had been allowed to get run-down.

Pettus: I mean, who doesn’t like Rothko? I immediately said yes.

Lee: All perspectives are elastic, but this one can be even more flexible.

Pettus: One of the worst things about this whole terrible thing is if I’m lying in bed, it’s hard for me to hold up books.

Lee: The realms are totally cut off from one another.

Discussion

Register or Login to leave a comment