The first time I ever
                        heard about oral sex was during the Lewinsky scandal. Mostly, I remember being
                        confused by President Clinton’s response—“It depends on what the meaning of
                        ‘is’ is.” When it comes to sex, politicians face all sorts of double standards:
                        who is allowed to have sex with whom, what constitutes sex, and whether it’s
                        appropriate, to name a few. Candie's Foundation’s announcement that
                        they were partnering with Bristol Palin to promote an abstinence-only campaign
                        has caused me to reflect on my own experiences as a political daughter, and the
                        role sex plays in defining the Republican Party.Let me get something straight: Bristol Palin, as an
                        18-year-old adult, is free to make her own choices and decide how she wants her
                        life to unfold. But for whatever reasons, the American public and media remain
                        overly engrossed in our politicians’ sex lives and, as in this case, those of
                        their families. There’s an especially unhealthy attitude among conservatives.
                        Daughters of Republican politicians aren’t expected to have sex, let alone
                        enjoy it—as if there were some strange chastity belt automatically attached to
                        us female offspring. God forbid anyone talk realistically about life
                        experiences and natural, sexual instincts. Nope, the answer is always
                        abstinence.
This is something I know
                        about firsthand. During my father’s 2000 presidential campaign, a reporter
                        asked how he would feel if I became pregnant and wanted an abortion. He
                        answered that it would be my choice, sending shockwaves throughout the party
                        (because for the GOP there is only one answer, and obviously Senator McCain’s
                        daughter shouldn’t be engaging in sex ever). I’d like to thank that reporter
                        for single-handedly putting me through years of trying to reconcile the fact
                        that when it comes to politics, no matter what you do or who you are,
                        everything is fair game.But seriously, here was a
                        father, delicately navigating a question about his teenage daughter and being
                        true to the kind of father he had always been, and the Republican Party was
                        outraged. It didn’t matter that my parents raised me to know that, regardless
                        of the mistakes I might make, they would allow me the dignity and courage to
                        make my own choices. That’s the kind of trust my parents have always placed in
                        their children—yet the GOP still needed to get involved and have a say in what
                        I did with my body.Here’s what I’ve never understood about the party:
                        its resistance to discussing better access to birth control. As a Republican, I
                        am pro-life. But using birth control and having an abortion are not the same at
                        all. Actually, the best way to prevent abortions is to educate people about
                        birth control and make it widely and easily accessible. True, abstinence is the
                        only way to fully prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Still,
                        the problem with abstinence-only education is that it does not make teenagers
                        and young adults more knowledgeable about all the issues they face if or when
                        they have sex—physically and emotionally.