Splicetoday

Politics & Media
Aug 11, 2008, 08:58AM

The Edwards Escape

John Edward's affair with a campaign staffer was first reported in the heat of the Democratic primary, but most media outlets failed to follow up. Some might think it makes no difference, but this writer explores one remarkable possibile outcome of an Edwards affair expose last winter: Hillary Clinton winning the nomination.

Edwards.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

Is this the woman who made the difference in Hillary Clinton's campaign?

Did anyone seriously doubt that Edwards had been screwing around? Did it matter? (Bipartisan alert: I say that as someone who's perfectly happy that Larry Craig decided to stick around. His only mistakes were pleading guilty to toe-tapping and sounding like a schmuck in his public statements.)

In Edwards' case, it took a caller to Howie Carr's show on WRKO Radio (AM 680) yesterday to snap me back to reality. Her point: If the media had ripped the bark off Edwards last fall, when he was still a semi-viable presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee today.

Good grief. She was right. While Barack Obama was winning Iowa, Clinton was coming in third, behind Edwards. Though she came back and won the New Hampshire primary the following week, she never really recovered from that devastating opening round. And until Edwards dropped out, he and Clinton split the anti-Obama vote. (I will grant you that these things change quickly. Just a few months earlier, Obama and Edwards were seen as splitting the anti-Clinton vote.)

Now, I haven't gone back and re-examined the post-New Hampshire results, so my logic may not be impeccable. Edwards did fade very quickly, so there probably weren't too many Clinton votes that he soaked up. But to the extent that he delayed the emergence of the Obama-versus-Clinton steel-cage match, he helped Obama enormously. And it was in those early weeks that Obama won the nomination.

Discussion
  • I never liked Edwards: his Two Americas didn't jibe with his huge house and expensive tastes. But I don't think Clinton would've been the nominee had the mainstream dailies gone after Edwards last fall for his affair (which, apparently, was tough to verify). One, it would've just reminded voters of Bill Clinton's own past and cast a negative light on Hillary. Two, Obama's message was so strong, I think he'd have prevailed, although it might've taken longer. Finally, though Edwards is now exposed as a hypocrite in his private life, that's hardly unique for a presidential candidate or president.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment