Splicetoday
Recent Feed Comments
  • The "manosphere" he describes (an echo chamber of unproved beliefs) mainly reminds me of the NYT.

    Responses to this comment
  • My son DeWitt and I were interviewed about DeWitt Clinton by WHEC, Rochester TV: https://www.whec.com/top-news/meet-dewitt-silber-the-15-year-old-5x-grandson-of-erie-canal-champion-gov-dewitt-clinton/?fbclid=IwY2xjawNT4KNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFmZTdlR3VzVGxGZjZuMzFPAR72hB8MGY8k2rZ_oihk_jt3PJCXLwUWTLBKw8YndwBkJoJAIZaNeGzf0xtyyw_aem_Avz7X_Ebdo3Rafgl-DB_Hg

    Responses to this comment
  • This was great. But an even larger problem is that the government's anti-racism and anti-poverty programs cause racism and poverty. And anti-racism and anti-poverty activists can get 6 figure jobs in those programs so they will not criticize them.

    Responses to this comment
  • The Unknown Hoya looks a bit like ARMY MAN from the same era. One of the negatives that came with the blossoming of the WWW a decade or so later, was the extinction of such photocopied-and-stapled 'zines, which were entertaining treasures in their physical form alone. Later in the decade, Adam Parfrey (with a now-forgotten partner) jump-started the first of his publishing houses with the original edition of Apocalypse Culture, a compilation of the lurid and satirical and eldritch that was recognizably the product of 'zine culture. No need to advise the reader, "For Purposes of Entertainment Only," this stuff occupied a sphere of creative research all its own.

    Responses to this comment
  • It was impossible to watch Blasey Ford tell her tale to the Senate and not detect a nervous, unpracticed liar being caught out. As I recall, she first made her claims on WhatsApp, after a few drinks 'round midnight.

    Responses to this comment
  • Like the author of this piece I also didn't follow Charlie Kirk much but I knew enough about him to see that he brought with him a unique set of traits and skill sets. Whether one agreed with him or not it was obvious to see that he was an articulate communicator and an autodidact who was well read and did his homework on topics ranging from history, theology, philosophy, current affairs and public policy. He was also an excellent organizer who built a movement that will live on without him and potentially expand far beyond where it is today. Perhaps what I found most impressive about Charlie Kirk was the indefatigable positive energy he brought to his movement and the courageous willingness to throw himself out there in the public square and engage with those he disagreed with often in hostile territory among students who loathed him all the while maintaining a positive disposition and respect for those he debated with.. In answer to the question posed at the top of this article " Who Will Fill His Shoes?" . Charlie Kirk is probably irreplaceable by just one person but many people perhaps hundreds using the free exchange of ideas ethos that he championed could replace him and take the movement that he built to new heights.

    Responses to this comment
  • Also recommend https://tomklingenstein.com/its-not-a-both-sides-problem/

    Responses to this comment
  • Texan: the photo is a generic one from the 1960s. "Dread" is the correct word.

    Responses to this comment
  • Thanks Russ for causing me even greater dread about car shopping. My car turns 10 next year and even though I don’t have loads of miles, my warranties have all turned to dust. My last purchase experience was a huge time suck and generally unpleasant. Similar to your experience just without the profanity No backstory on the photo?

    Responses to this comment
  • Even better comedy here around 20 minute mark. Curtis Yarvin saying that black gangbangers should be made into indentured servants of ministers, who track them with air tags. Followed by Christopher Caldwell saying 14th amendment should be repealed to allow such methods. None of this is meant to be funny, btw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1uSsqe0GuA

    Responses to this comment
  • May be a dud, but it opened the door for the Stones to branch out to ballads, which they proved to be good at.

    Responses to this comment
  • "The agents moved so fast to detain Rodrigo [a U.S. citizen] that they left their SUV in drive. Security footage shows the vehicle rolling forward as an agent then runs after it." ICE living up to its comedy potential at 1:41 in video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQCYSzFQYmY

    Responses to this comment
Recent Splice Original Comments
  • Do you have actual evidence of this zip tying?

    Responses to this comment
  • The issue is not self-censorship. It's signing a contract agreeing to be censored. They are not the same thing.

    Responses to this comment
  • Months later, this matter is still unresolved, and its broader implications still very bad. https://open.substack.com/pub/theunpopulist/p/the-administrations-foolish-war-on?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tn2fl

    Responses to this comment
  • It's not about what I think. It's a counterpoint to what you wrote above. Louis C.K. along with many other artists performed for the troops during the Iraq and Afghanistan war. In that conext, whether performing at Saudi Arabia deserves the attention or is a sign of hypocrisy or of 'selling out', is worth considering.

    Responses to this comment
  • Doubt anyone cares about what you think probably happened.

    Responses to this comment
  • Louis C.K. performed for the troops in Afghanistan a while back. He probably self-censored then and avoided teasing about the criminality of the war or the pointlessness of his audience's 'service'.

    Responses to this comment
  • If Bill "Free Luigi!" Burr were living in Saudi Arabia and celebrated the assassination of a Saudi Health Plan Executive like he did in the U.S his penalty could be imprisonment and torture or even beheading since political dissent in Saudi Arabia is regularly punishable by this form of execution. Bill Burr has earned the hypocrite epithet but an equally fitting epithet would be prostitute and not even a high class prostitute like an escort or courtesan but more like a sleazy dirty boulevard street whore.

    Responses to this comment
  • So you're upset that they're targeting those who support the overthrow of the US government?

    Responses to this comment
  • I recommend people read the Brennan Center's analysis of recent executive orders targeting free speech here: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trumps-orders-targeting-antifascism-aim-criminalize-opposition Excerpt: >> Building on the antifa executive order, which already targets a broad range of political speech, NSPM-7 directs federal agencies to prioritize investigations of a swath of identities and ideologies that it depicts as falling under “the umbrella of self-described ‘anti-fascism.’” These include “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.”<<

    Responses to this comment
  • You can say or write anything you want to in this country, as you know very well.

    Responses to this comment
  • "Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down.” That's the sign you put on your lawn, Ken? Was Charlie Kirk given that consideration? He just got murdered for it. Don't you think it's your job to tell us what thoughts and opinions the government has denied you, and all Americans, from expressing?

    Responses to this comment
  • Wind blew my signs over, so I was at end of driveway fixing them. Guy in pickup rolled up, impressed by the "Defend the Constitution" sign. He told me Pam Bondi and others in the Justice Dept were not doing enough to go after Trump's enemies, thus betraying Trump, who's a "good man" but too trusting of his do-nothing subordinates. He spoke on this for a while, then asked me my views, which I vaguely said weren't fully aligned with his, but we agreed the Constitution is the guidepost we need to follow; as he put it, "the only document we got."

    Responses to this comment
Recent Multimedia Comments
  • That and GQ?

    Responses to this comment
  • I think seeing The Sting as a young teen or pre-teen helped turn me gay. THAT was a hot couple!

    Responses to this comment
  • Trump has won twice, but neither of these guys have the slightest idea of why that happened. Try harder, Splice Today.

    Responses to this comment
  • Hard to imagine thinking that Marc Maron has any real insights into the future of American politics. He's a good comedian and decent interviewer, but his talent stops there. And in this clip, he's talking to a fellow insufferably smug progressive, Sam Seder, who hasn't had an original thought in decades. Posting such material is a total waste of time. Thanks for nothing.

    Responses to this comment
  • Actually the second littlest one was not her son because he was younger than my dad, i unfortunately don’t remember which cousin he was but the tallest boy was my great aunt’s son.

    Responses to this comment
  • They are not going to school, my grandfather filmed this. It was a leisurely trip to the end of the line by lake Roland. The little blondie in white was my dad and the dark haired second tallest boy in stripes was my uncle. The lady that was on camera before they boarded was my aunt Bea and the two other boys I think were her sons

    Responses to this comment
  • Such a great song. So sad youngin's don't know our music in the 60's and 70's was SO much better than their music is.

    Responses to this comment
  • "If you only know a cup this way, you don't know the cup." David Thomas threw off sparks every time he opened his mouth.

    Responses to this comment
  • A loving/moving biography of Les Baxter: https://lesbaxter.com/pages/biography

    Responses to this comment
  • This is great. please add a blusky link one of these days.

    Responses to this comment
  • Just saw it yesterday. She was terrific.

    Responses to this comment
  • Kamala Harris makes a surprise SNL cameo appearance on the weekend before the election and gets rewarded with a slobbery kiss from SNL and their informal endorsement. Unlike the SNL portrayal of Kamala from early in October where she was humorously mocked this appearance was a cringe inducing fawning over her by SNL which came across as contrived and particularly unfunny ..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff-rqlU4ZWw...I'm sure this Kamala SNL appearance and portrayal by Maya Rudolph got Howard Sterns full approval though.. .For a minute there I thought SNL was getting back to it's roots of prioritizing comedy and being funny but I guess I jumped the gun on that. For SNL it is back to their primary objective of being left wing propagandists..

    Responses to this comment